Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1564

reference
971-tree-1
name
1564
tree-preservation-order

undefined

971-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.000490 50.855246)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.000433 50.855240,-1.000436 50.855251,-1.000443 50.855261,-1.000456 50.855269,-1.000471 50.855274,-1.000489 50.855276,-1.000507 50.855274,-1.000523 50.855269,-1.000535 50.855262,-1.000544 50.855252,-1.000547 50.855241,-1.000544 50.855229,-1.000536 50.855219,-1.000524 50.855211,-1.000508 50.855206,-1.000491 50.855204,-1.000473 50.855206,-1.000457 50.855211,-1.000444 50.855219,-1.000436 50.855228,-1.000433 50.855240)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL